- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nom is probably a student at the school who thinks nominating this will get it deleted .... unfortunately as he doesn't know policies he's failed rather miserably here, Anyway no valid reason has been presented for deletion and obviously meets SO etc etc etc. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010Talk 21:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Cornwallis Academy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Page not needed Stuart.eatwell (talk) 12:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Typically, secondary schools are considered notable. Sourcing here is a bit... iffy. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 16:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A recent RfC says to avoid quoting WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES but still suggests that only quite basic coverage is needed for high schools, and that's easy to find: Ofsted report, School Guide details, local coverage of school uniform controversy, Department for Education data, Argus listing, story about the construction, case study in a book about effective parental involvement in school government, etc. Mortee (talk) 15:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As well as the sources mentioned by Mortee, there are several more at kentonline.co.uk and other news sources (although few of them are complimentary). This article seems to be a magnet for vandalism, but that is not a reason to delete. The nominator provided no reason at all for deletion - "not needed" is not a test we use! It seems this school is notable in Kent (under current guidelines, notability for high schools can be established by print and/or local media), and it is the subject of a case study of parental involvement in education. Jack N. Stock (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Strange nom. School is extant. Is reasonably large secondary school. Lots of sources. No brainer. CalzGuy (talk) 01:38, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus. Ludicrous rationale for deletion (i.e. none) from a single-purpose account. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.