The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:SNOW, spam, etc Tone 22:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corpse Road (movie/series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-Notable future film lacking article references and any references in Google. Nothing in IMDB to support pre-production or involvement by actor noted ttonyb1 (talk) 07:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment-Yes, I know there is an issue with the title - either I messed something up or I stepped on a bug. Hopefully someone will give me a hand to fix the/my issue.

• Fixed it. Oh, and delete per lack of notability or any semblance of sources. Graymornings_(talk) 07:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete non-notable film project, no evidence production has started, release date unclear, thus it fails WP:NFF. Baileypalblue (talk) 08:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. ((db-spam)) would have been easier. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I've tried to make it easier. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for the above reasons plus the problems with the copyright that's asserted in the body of the article. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Complete lack of third-party sources that could establish notability; web search reveals nothing that could help, either. §FreeRangeFrog 18:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: Only one vote so far for "speedy delete", so I'll remove the speedy tag, but if you guys change your mind and want to speedy, I'll be happy to do it. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 18:53, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Concur with Speedy Deletion. ttonyb1 (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. I also agree with a speedy - there's no assertion of notability in the article. Graymornings_(talk) 21:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.