The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Counter-hegemonic globalization

[edit]
Counter-hegemonic globalization (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The concept has no notability. It's a concept created by one scholar and tied exclusively to that scholar's work. I don't see why the concept can't be incorporated into Counterhegemony, Global justice movement and other related concepts. It's strange to refer to something as a "social movement" when the only mentions of it are in the works by one person. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Logs: 2013-09 restored, 2013-09 G6
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.