The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:40, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crawdaddy (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also I nominate:

• Shame on You (The Native Years)
• Pop Said... Withdraw this. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:37, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Erotica (The Darling Buds album)

None of them charted, and they don't demostrate why they are notables by their own. They fail WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS greatly. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC) Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 04:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Coverage for Crawdaddy includes Spin, Boston Globe, Washington Post, and Washington Times. Coverage for Erotica includes Time, USA Today, Billboard, and Allmusic. Both of these appear to meet WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS. Note that most of the coverage in these sources is behind paywalls and/or have snippet views in Google Books, and that further coverage is likely in UK-based magazines such as NME, Melody Maker, etc, whose back issues I don't have access to. I'm not finding coverage for the Shame on You (The Native Years) compilation (in online sources), so I'm open to redirecting that one to the artist's main page.  Gong show 16:56, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The band is clearly notable, and all of these albums received reviews from multiple reliable sources. --Michig (talk) 18:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.