The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:15, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creative Control (music company)

[edit]
Creative Control (music company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Request Deletion as a non-notable company. The company is not listed in either Hoover's or Dun & Bradstreet. There is no coverage in secondary sources. The claimed notability is from work done by the partners at Lionsgate, and even then credit appears to be claimed for more than their work. There is no basis for notability. The first Afd was improvidently closed (WP:NPASR) before anyone commented on the original request. It had two relistings, but they were within an hour and twenty minutes of each other, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Creative Control (music company) --Bejnar (talk) 03:55, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have left friendly notices of this Afd at the talk pages of King of Hearts who closed the original Afd on the same day that it was relisted (twice), and B.Wind who objected to a prod after the first Afd. --Bejnar (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My objection is procedural - once an article has been prodded or gone through an AfD, it cannot be deleted through prod (in fact, a prod is not permitted under these circumstances), but only by AfD or speedy deletion (see WP:PROD). I reserve the option of forming an opinion about this article at a later time, if appropriate. B.Wind (talk) 04:26, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.