The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Crumb. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:06, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crumb family

[edit]

Article is an orphaned stub. There has not been any significant work done on this stub in years. Content of article contains nothing which is not found in the articles it lists. Content is better suited for a navbox which has been created. Danleary25 (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a tough one, as I'm not completely sure which category this comes under. This 'list' is unnecessary. I'd suggest creating paragraphs in the articles mentioned in the list referencing other notable people in the family. Anti venin 12:59, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and possibly merge to Crumb, a disambiguation page. This seems to me to be the way hallowed by precedent to deal with multiple people sharing a last name. I like this text slightly better than the disambiguation text, if only because it gives a bit more context. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect Create disambiguation page, possible merge, but meets WP:NOTE cf38^talk 15:18, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Crumb, the article really doesn't hold any real difference to the Disambiguation page Afkatk - The Mind Reader (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.