The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per outcomes, and significant improvements to article. Millermk90 (talk) 00:02, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

D. Y. Patil college of Engineering and Technology, Kolhapur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can not find any sources online other than first party websites, and "yellowpages" types listings containing only addresses and phone numbers, so I don't think this is notable. Adittionally, parts of the article read like an ad ("well equipped laboratories, workshops" and "has an experienced faculty including"), yet lack an sources for such claims. Finally, the inclusion of so many external links seems very questionalable. Even if consensus find that the article should be kept, it would still require be almost completely rewritten. Millermk90 (talk) 06:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 12:31, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Afd is not the place for formatting an article.If such a necessity arises then it can be countered by normal editing.WP:OUTCOMES says "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions and high schools are being kept except when zero independent sources can be found to prove that the institution actually exists".The existence of the college can be proved from this which is the list of affiliated colleges under Shivaji University.Vivekananda De--tAlK 13:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment after reading the outcomes you linked to, I am goind to speedy keep the page, especially since I did a fair bit of work, and the article is now significantly better. Millermk90 (talk) 23:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.