- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Southern Broadcasting Network#Radio stations. The Delete and Redirect views are based on policy, which the Keep !votes did not address. Owen× ☎ 00:57, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- DXIP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in reliable sources. No clear redirect target. MarioGom (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and Philippines. MarioGom (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: The third source is just an aircheck. The rest of the sources are secondary and talk about the station's programming. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. ASTIG😎🙃 10:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- What sources exactly do you see with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth? Just to be clear what you think is SIGCOV.
- Keep Meets WP:GNG per Astig's argument. Sources mentioned are reliable enough and secondary, with the ones mentioned by Astig in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 23:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Southern Broadcasting Network#Radio stations; all four of the references in the current version fail WP:GNG for one reason or another: #1 name-drops the station once in a series that includes three other stations (fails WP:SIGCOV), #2 mentions the station twice in passing with absolutely no detail or context about the station (also fails WP:SIGCOV), #3 is a WP:UGC since it's a YouTube video authored by "Dante's Enigmatic World", who has no meaningful and established journalistic reputation, and #4 is a WP:BLOG. Left guide (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:21, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Source eval:
| Comments |
Source
|
| Nothing about subject. Mentions station merger, but no details, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth |
1. Vice guv to be back soon, daughters say
|
| Interviews that mention the name of the station, no details, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth |
2. ^ FAST BACKWARD: Media in time of Covid-19
|
| Primary |
3. ^ DXIP Davao Sign-Off 1988
|
| Mentions an interview from the station, nothing meeting SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth |
4. ^ ANAD PARTYLIST STANDS PAT THAT DAVAO CITY IS NOT PEACEFUL
|
- BEFORE found nothing with WP:SIGCOV from WP:IS WP:RS addressing the subject directly and indepth // Timothy :: talk 17:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.