The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Convinced by those arguing for delete. Most mentions are largely about the crazy cool idea the founder had, and only mention the company in passing. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 00:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dahir Insaat[edit]

Dahir Insaat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable company; the references are largely about the founder Dahir Semenov. Coverage of "viral videos" would not be sufficient for an architecture firm to meet WP:ORGDEPTH. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:37, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 02:41, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, google is showing enough refs [1] [2] etc. Szzuk (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep, seems just a little notable. startTerminal (haha wow talk page | startTerminal on irc) 01:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, ignoring if their proposals are realistic or not this company does seem notable from its broad coverage on many diffrent platforms. Here's another good onedesignboom--GlobalSecretary (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not one of the references provided meets the criteria for establishing notability. Most of the references are about the founder, Dahir Semenov, and are not about the company. Notability is not inherited. The toptenz reference fails WP:RS. Both references listed by Szzuk fail the criteria for establishing notability also - the inhabitat.com reference fails WP:RS since it is a blog and this Huff Post] article fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. In a similar vein this designboom.com reference also fails WP:CORPDEPTH and nothing more that a thinly veiled advert complete with a huge promotional youtube video produced by the company. Wikipedia is not a platform for advertising or promotion. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:11, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep when I click on the "News" link above the results include lots of articles about this company and its design innovations. Article is about the company and its leader. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:53, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • FloridaArmy, can you please post *links* to articles that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability? Otherwise a closing admin might dismiss your !vote since you have not offered anything for them to evaluate whether this topic actually meets the criteria or not. The entire first page of News contain links to articles that are based on promotional videos or other literature provided by the company and none meet the criteria for WP:CORPDEPTH. Thank you. HighKing⁺⁺ 21:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Sourcing is in passing and / or WP:SPIP. Just a directory listing, which Wikipedia is WP:NOT. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:34, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks in-depth coverage about the company, as most articles contain a paragraph or two providing a brief history of Dahir Insaat. This indicates a failure of the new WP:NCORP guidelines, and I will emphasize the article likely fails WP:CORPDEPTH.--SamHolt6 (talk) 00:04, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. The sources presented by Szzuk, above, are really just passing mentions of the firm, and the designboom video, while flashy eye-candy, doesn't really say anything about the firm. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per WP:CORP, no RS are found this far and agree per the above that these are passing mention, and focus more on invention than firm --Quek157 (talk) 16:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.