The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 03:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik Prantajyoti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable daily newspaper which fails WP:NME  Mrwikidor ←track 20:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Notable Bengali newspaper from Assam, cited by reliable source like [1]. BengaliHindu (talk) 14:30, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• That is a University site where students and professors can have their own page. Please, read here[2]. Mrwikidor ←track 15:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:29, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A well- known and notable newspaper in Eastern India.-- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 06:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, criterion 2 for newspapers under WP:NMEDIA includes papers that "have a significant history". This paper has been around since 1957, finding sources for a foreign language newspaper is tough, I don't think we need I high bar on these. J04n(talk page) 20:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.