The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran (t • c) 00:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dainik Yugashankha

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and fails WP:NME Mrwikidor ←track 20:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I moved the article from Dainik Yugashankha to a more productive transliteration in search, which is Dainik Jugasankha. Crtew (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notable Bengali language newspaper published from three cities in Assam. BengaliHindu (talk) 14:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But that doesn't help it pass the WP:NME, sorry! Mrwikidor ←track 15:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A well- known and notable newspaper in Eastern India.- Jayanta Nath ^{(Talk|Contrb)} 05:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep: Using the new transliteration of Dainik Jugasankha, the newspaper clearly meets WP:NME as it is covered by reliable sources, has been published over 60 years and is one of the top newspapers in Assam. Crtew (talk) 00:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm seeing a good deal of source coverage here. — Cirt (talk) 16:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.