The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 00:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy Head (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this might meet WP:GNG; only reliable reference is merely a passing mention as part of a cast list. Launchballer 16:19, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Does not meet WP:ENT criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 17:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:47, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete . Not notable enough to have an article in WP. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY --Jersey92 (talk) 23:57, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - she has potential to achieve notability in the future but her roles thus far are not sufficient to pass WP:NACTOR and, also, the sources fail to meet WP:GNG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:09, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.