The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dan Nevill[edit]

The article claims that this young actor is a co-star in a popular television show, but the article does not include any reliable sources confirming his notability, nor could I find such references with a google search. Is it a hoax, or just a self-aggrandizing autobiography? Or, and I'm stretching good faith as far as I can here, is this a notable person whose sources I simply couldn't find? FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Speedy delete as hoax. Oli Filth^(talk) 23:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No secondary source evidence of notability. Kevin (talk) 00:50, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete per WP:COI. Created by single purpose account, DanN91 for the purposes of self-aggrandisement Ohconfucius (talk) 03:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable bio Jasynnash2 (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vain vanity in vain. JuJube (talk) 10:32, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HOAX. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, fails the everything test. RFerreira (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per JuJube. Cunard (talk) 21:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per Ohconfucius. ~ Antiselfpromotion (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.