The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep due to bad-faith nomination. | Mr. Darcy talk 19:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Danay Ferrer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Totally fails Wikipedia notabilty standards. Author spent more time on cute graphics than actual information? You know why? Because there is NO information worth writing about! Delete this tenny bopper garbage post haste. --MinervaSimpson 06:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Simply because something is teeny bopper doesn't make it worthy of deletion. Having said that, is no additional information and notability, so a redirect is probably not worthwhile and I agree delete. Akihabara 07:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - one step too far removed from notable musicians to pass WP:MUSIC. MER-C 07:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Subject has nothing outside of an obscure pop group to warrant inclusion. Caknuck 08:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per MER-C Localzuk^(talk) 17:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment AfD created by a sockpuppet, see here[1] ThuranX 18:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.