The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Mazzone[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, based primarily on blogs, of an artist whose only discernible claim of notability is that he was once called "the next Andy Warhol" by a venture capitalist with no particularly noteworthy track record of expertise in identifying next Andy Warhols. There's nothing here that's even really quantifiable in terms of whether he passes WP:CREATIVE or not, so it's WP:GNG or bust -- but with just one appropriately reliable source here, this is WP:TOOSOON at best. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when his notability and sourceability improve enough. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lack of sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:19, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for lack of sources Mduvekot (talk) 13:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More sources for Daniel Mazzone:

http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/meet-the-finance-bro-turned-artist-that-jose-bautista-commissioned-to-make-his-portrait http://elitedaily.com/envision/artist-next-andy-warhol-photos/1032905/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.89.255.83 (talk) 23:43, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and I would've also considered PROD, simply nothing at all whatsoever for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.