The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment Searching on Google Scholar/Books shows that this is certainly not nonsense, although I'm not sure if the coverage is extensive enough to verify the article to a minimally acceptable degree. Skomorokh09:33, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is just spam for a nonsensical new age nonsense book. The only source is the book, the only online source a website pushing the book. There's a few other names dropped to try to make it look legit, but it's drivel. Nick mallory (talk) 13:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.