The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rust shooting incident. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Halls (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E; no depth of coverage, just mentions in relation to film shooting incident legal proceedings. Any relevant information to this individual belongs in Rust shooting incident. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:52, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree this info should be included on Rust shooting incident. Not enough coverage to merit his own page. Comatmebro (talk) 01:16, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No independent notability, sufficient to include in Rust articles. WWGB (talk) 06:20, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the arguments above. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment if you don't want to keep it, why not change it into a redirect w/ possibilities? Also there doesn't seem to be enough emphasis on the contrasting explanations of his involvement on the Rust article. WakandaQT (talk) 04:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.