The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:08, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

David Partlett (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This person seems to have done very little if anything noteworthy. As the current dean of a law school he certainly merits mention on the article about that school. It seems he has done nothing more of particular note other than being the dean. Aar☢n Bruce^Talk/_Contribs 19:15, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Reads like a resume. I agree with the nom, put a short mention on the school's article unless sources can be identified that prove notability beyond the fact he is the dean of a law school.
  Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Do)
  19:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Fails Wikipedia:Notability (people). SWik78 (talk) 20:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. No evidence that he passes WP:PROF. His citation record reported by Google Scholar looks distinctly underwhelming. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.