The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — Aitias // discussion 23:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Samuels (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Possibly notable under our inclusion standards, but I can't find any indication of sourcing to demonstrate that. rootology (C)(T) 22:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.