The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete votes. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Roses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion per WP:MOVIE. Result of checking notability is failed. Vanquisher.UA^(talk) 02:11, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. --Vanquisher.UA^(talk) 12:06, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. I remember coming across this and being a little iffy about it when I cleaned it up. I did manage to find a lengthy mention of the film in a book, which pushes it to a weak keep for me. I wish that we had a review or something for it, as that's make it more of a confident keep for my liking. There are two local sources (NY papers), but we also have the NPR link as well as the 2007 book source, which makes me lean towards a weak keep. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:47, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.