The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Moon Tycoon. Merge can be carried out from article history. ansh666 09:15, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deep Sea Tycoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article seems to be non notable - the article itself indicates the video game received no reviews, I couldn't find anything relevant about it with a Google Search. The external links which could be used for reference point to a primary source (the game's page), a dead link, and to a wiki-like website about games which, given its crowdsourced nature cannot be used as a ref. Having no references and being apparently not notable, I'm nominating it for deletion. Saturnalia0 (talk) 20:27, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 20:57, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep - WP:ASSERTN is not the way to judge notability. Mobygames lists 4 reliable reviews and 3 of which are still up on the internet. [1]. It seems like it barely squeaks by notability, but it still seems notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 16:48, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The game is described as being similar to the developer's earlier title, Moon Tycoon. It seems to be sort of a spiritual sequel if not part of the same series. I first thought that perhaps Deep Sea Tycoon could have its own section in that article. However that title seems to have even less coverage. Clearly the two should be combined in some way, though. Mr. Magoo (talk) 21:00, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moon Tycoon is indeed notable enough for its own article, per MobyGames. [2] Plenty of reviews here to be inserted. A redirect to Moon Tycoon wouldn't be out of the question._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:54, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would a section at Moon Tycoon then suffice? Deep Sea Tycoon doesn't have that much text to begin with. We can keep the infobox, place it next to the text in the section there. Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let's just say I wouldn't be prejudiced against a redirect. If you changed your vote to redirect as well, as per your proposal, then that would be the consensus, unless someone else weighs in differently._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 04:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Moon Tycoon, the first part of the series. Mr. Magoo (talk) 00:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 16:10, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• I think this is some combination of merge and redirect, per Magoo and Zxcvbnm and WP:ATD. --Izno (talk) 13:25, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.