The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted by Anthony Bradbury under A10. However interested editors' attention is respectfully drawn to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delores Chamblin (Duncan) where the same topic is being debated.—S Marshall T/C 13:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Delores Chamblin

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Calabe1992 (talk) 01:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete and Salt per suspicion of sole promotional reasons. Note: Creator has also made Delores Chamblin (Duncan), which also is being considered here for deletion. SwisterTwister (talk) 01:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment With all due respect for the enthusiasm shown by SwisterTwister, this article is not a candidate for either speedy deletion or salting. This is an article about an African-American crochet artist with a long, documented career. Reasonable people may disagree whether or not this person is notable by Wikipedia standards. Fine. But this is not a case of a stubborn garage band or obscure promotional website trying to game our system. Let's assume good faith. Let's have a dignified one week debate rather than talking about "speedy" or "salt". Cullen328 (talk) 04:01, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural Keep as nominator gave no reason to speak of in regards to deletion; please add a reason because otherwise I see no reason for this sourced article to be removed. Nate • (chatter) 05:31, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.