The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Denapaona[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. There is no meaningful content in this article that cannot be covered in the article of the corresponding author. Mopswade (talk) 08:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:14, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:18, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Rabindranath Tagore.--Goldsztajn (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Striking my !vote, noticed that there is scatter gun deletion here with no evidence of BEFORE. --Goldsztajn (talk) 20:59, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for essentially the same reason I've just outlined at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakritir Pratisodh: "Point #5 of WP:BK is clearly met: Tagore is a Nobel laureate and arguably the most significant figure in Indian literature. That criterion doesn't require that we have articles for every book he ever wrote, but those, such as this, where a measure of sourcing can be found should certainly be kept. The sources currently in the article, [both] of which are high-quality academic books, may well also be sufficient to satisfy WP:GNG and point #1 of WP:BK. It strikes me as likely that sources in Indian languages, which I'm not able to find as I only speak English, will also exist. Given Tagore's prolific career, it isn't reasonable, as the nominator seems to suggest, to discuss each of his works in his article." To which I'll add that redirecting this to an article where it isn't mentioned would also be unwise for obvious reasons. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As this is arguably one of the more famous of his works, there is scope for expansion. At the same time, the sources on the article only have a limited mention of the work (summary/transcribed work), and considering that it didn't even receive a passing mention in the article of the author and does not give any new content that doesn't exist in the list of his works. Not saying that it can't be developed, but there doesn't seem to be any meaning in creating one line articles of which the information is covered elsewhere. Mopswade (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD is not cleanup. WP:NEXIST.--Goldsztajn (talk) 09:39, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There is a play with the same name Dena_Paona (Dena Paona/Dena-Paona etc. are names for the work as well) Mopswade (talk) 07:50, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Satisfies criteria 5 of NBOOK. The author, Rabindranath Tagore won the Nobel Prize for Literature. James500 (talk) 14:58, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.