The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Denodo[edit]

Denodo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One very specialized 2009 award is not enough for notability. DGG ( talk ) 22:59, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam on an unremarkable business. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank for your help and feedback. the content of the page is now edited, simplified and added a couple of references that provides further information.

• Delete Agree with above comments. Light2021 (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.