The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Evans & Sutherland . v/r - T P 00:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Digistar 3[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable projection product, and a non-notable list of places that use that product. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 07:16, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure: my business has a commercial relationship with the manufacturer of this technology. DigiStar as a family of products is notable for being the first digital immersive projection system. However, I agree that singling out the technology and in particular featuring one particular generation of it (Digistar 3) gives it undue prominence. How do folks feel about merging the text of this article into that covering its manufacturer, Evans & Sutherland, as a section? I am happy to do that if it follows a consensus decision. Hugh Mason (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would not be opposed to a section devoted to the Digistar line, explaining why it is unique, etc., but is there any content in this article that is worth merging? We can't fill articles with sections on every product from every line they have made; that is a catalog. "DigiStar as a family of products is notable for being the first digital immersive projection system." - this article mentions none of that, and only talks about general info on Digistar 3. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:34, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

merge some of it to Evans & Sutherland as suggested. Obvious solution. DGG ( talk ) 02:42, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:37, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B music ian 03:33, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge a brief mention to company article. - Frankie1969 (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge in to Evans & Sutherland. Suggest also merge Digistar II, Digistar Users Group, LDS-1 (Line Drawing System-1) and Evans & Sutherland ES-1 while we're at it. --Kvng (talk) 23:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any sourcable content into E&S. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 04:37, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.