- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 17:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Dillion Harper (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails gng and pornbio. Spartaz Humbug! 13:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. MT TrainDiscuss 13:41, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment -- This is not the right place to establish policy about a class of BLP for whom the subject is likely to have a career of three years. It is absolutely irrelevant to the English language Wikipedia whether a sister article exists in other languages or their quality. It is a case of circular logic to base an article on other wikis, none of which are reliable. Rhadow (talk) 15:33, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The article doesn't have a single reliable source, and I couldn't find significant coverage in reliable sources in Google, either. The only significant coverage I could find was this interview entirely about shaving pubic hair. I don't know if Popsugar counts as a reliable source. Their "about us" is all about marketing, but their jobs section does list some editorial positions. I did also find a couple of brief mentions regarding her wishing "happy birthday" to a Mexican YouTuber, Google Translate messing with her name, being one of the top 5 most searched for porn actresses on Pornhub, and this listicle of 10 popular porn actresses. But those are all pretty low-quality, and I don't think there's enough depth to satisfy the GNG. -- irn (talk) 15:52, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
*The Nightmoves Award falls short of the "well-known and significant industry award" criterion for WP:PORNBIO and the win lacks coverage by independent reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
-
- @Davey2010: bwahaha! Your response made my day ma man! On a serious note, she looks very cute. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.