The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:05, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Diplomat (card game)[edit]

Diplomat (card game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a card game. Only source found is a playing card manufacturer's blog, which may well be citogenesis, note discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacon (card game). "Ultimate Book of Card Games" (2012) has a different (solitaire) game of this name [1]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• DELETE: fails NOR The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC) — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs). [reply]
• Strong delete Fails WP:NGAMES, WP:GNG and has had ((Template:Unreferenced)) for nearly eight years. –Cupper52^Discuss! 18:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom KylieTastic (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unreferenced. BEFORE failed to find anything to save this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:11, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - searches did not show it pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:35, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep Considering card games in general are rarely very notable compared to say, cancer, it's important to keep in mind the relative degree of notability in this subject. To that end, the fact that a quick google search returns multiple results for how to play this game suggests that this is indeed sufficiently notable. BrxBrx(talk)^{(please reply with ((SUBST:re|BrxBrx)))} 03:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.