The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:22, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discovery Offices

[edit]
Discovery Offices (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bogus article; bogus references. It's written as if it exists. Even if it once existed on paper, that paper seems to be have been lost. No in-depth reliable sources can be found. All references cited are primary or PR that lead nowhere. It's a mystery how the article has stood since 2013. I'm going through the creator's problematic history (also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Imperial 3). This fails all notability guidelines and, further, bears no resemblance to reality. MaysinFourty (talk) 15:47, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.