The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 23:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diva (novel)[edit]

Diva (novel) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

one sentence stub about inconsequential novel that does not assert notability nor cite references. one external link is a deadlink. portuguese wikipedia version is similarly uncited and of bad quality. SuperSuperBoi (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It looks like the Portuguese Wikipedia has more info, btw. M1ss1ontomars2k4 (talk) 03:00, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, notable novel of notable author... and I favor letting such stubs stay until expanded. gren グレン 09:12, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as a notable work by a notable author. AfD is not clean up, concerns over article length or quality of references should be handled with appropriate tagging before even considering deletion. - Dravecky (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment If it's kept, it should be renamed, so as to avoid confusion with Diva (Odier novel). Dori (Talk • Contribs) 20:30, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.