- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Divine.ca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although this was kept 10 years ago, our criteria for notability have tightened considerably since then, and I believe the time has come for review.
This website does not appear to pass the criteria of WP:GNG, WP:NMAG (treating it as a magazine), or WP:NWEB (treating it as a website). Significantly, I was not able to find any in-depth discussion of the website itself anywhere, and there is nothing to indicate that it has made a significant impact in its field. Some ROUTINE sources exist in the form of business announcements ("Jane Doe joins staff of Divine.ca" etc), but nothing non-routine that would indicate notability. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:42, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:11, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.