The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don Lichterman

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable vanity Wikipedia bio page, suspected to have been created by the subject. See Wikipedia:Notability for guidelines. Kojiclutch (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. All of the "sources" provided in the article are dead links but you can tell from the URLs that they are not reliable sources. Fails WP:BIO. Terence7 (talk) 22:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 21:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Reads like a resume, not an encyclopedia entry. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 21:41, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.