The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Red Phoenix ^{let's talk...} 22:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Double Seventh Festival (disambiguation)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have build Double Seventh Festival to replace this page, for better wikidata links 燃玉 (talk) 17:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~Oppose~~. There's no reason to coalesce three already-extant and separate articles of different festivals (from Chinese, Korean, Japanese cultures) into one article, and certainly not to appease wikidata (since other language wikipedia didn't clean up their articles and just heap it together). Also, it is clear that "Double Seventh Festival" refers primary to the Chinese variant [1] from the Googlebooks results, so a hatnote and dab page is suited. --Cold Season (talk) 21:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose is not a valid deletion opinion. See WP:AfD. Cheers and Thanks, L235-Talk Ping when replying 03:30, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Is there some set and static "multiple choice criteria" that I have to meet? No. And it's a good thing that I didn't strictly vote with no comment. I think you have enough common sense to grasp what's meant, but I will change it to appease you. --Cold Season (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I prefer the original state with the disambiguation page (the page requested to be deleted here) instead of the new overlaying article. The relation between the articles is clarified in the articles themselves. The overlaying article did not add any information. I see no reason why we need this seperate article. Wikidata links are not a good enough reason on its own to change content. -- Taketa (talk) 07:38, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep As above. J 1982 (talk) 16:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

note to closing admin J 1982 (talk · contribs) has made a spree of 23 identical keep as above !votes in 29 minutes. LibStar (talk) 12:17, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.