The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 05:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DreamStreet, The Musical (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nomination: 64.6.103.81 tagged the article for AfD, but was unable to complete the process. His/her comments from the article's talk page are below. I abstain. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 22:36, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Please rewrite or delete this, it really is blatant advertising. "effectively captured and sadness, fear and hope of the kids as they faced their last night together and an uncertain future" "unusual and groundbreaking for it's time", "must-see" "rave reviews" "muscular, athletic and witty choreography thrilled audiences " yadda yadda. 64.6.103.81 (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. In fairness, this was a real and verifiable Las Vegas production [1], although sources about it may not be easily accessible. A Wikipedia article about it may be justifiable as long as the hype is removed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, I agree that there should be an article about the musical, but not this article. Please consider this nomination withdrawn if anyone actually does rewrite the thing. 64.6.103.81 (talk) 08:26, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The show is verifiable and won an award. The problems mentioned can be solved through editing without deletion which policy explicitly cites as a reason not to delete. AfD is not the place to force cleanup. Leaving a note on the talk page of the editor who created it, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicals is a better move. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The show is verifiable, and given the dates that it ran, it's not surprising that web sources for information are a bit weak. I'm positive that reliable offline sourcing can be found by people who are local to Vegas and the other production locations. (And I declined a speedy and prod by the same editor who tried to open this discussion.)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:01, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.