The result was merge any relevant and cited information to Dryad, as gathered consensus deems appropriate. ÷seresin 23:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It has been proposed that this article be (re)merged with Dryads, but there is no valuable content to merge. Furthermore the article's subject does not seem to be independantly notable, as there are no relevant results with searches for Dryads in fiction or Dryads in popular culture. I enjoy salvaging information, but there is no information here to salvage, and as a topic there is nothing notable to be said. NickPenguin(contribs) 15:48, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]