The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Due.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article creator contested PROD. WP:PROMO article of a company with little in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources. Most of the sources available are in routine lists of business software, and the one source the article creator added was by a marketing firm CEO to Entrepreneur, which contained a disclaimer at the bottom that Due.com was a content partner. I couldn't find sources that satisfy the requirements of WP:ORG. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:SEO/WP:BUZZWORD-filled article which doesn't have the WP:N to back it up. Nate • (chatter) 01:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Inclusion in lists doesn't constitute a reliable independent 3rd party source as per WP:RS. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 18:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 07:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.