- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Dugave (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sources and no evidence of notability. A quick Google search didn't turn up any results. So far the article has only served to attract vandalism. G S Palmer (talk) 00:17, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:44, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep as a place where 10k people live[1] is notable in and of itself as a gazetteer matter, WP:5. Nevertheless, the other concerns may be alleviated by upmerging it into its district article. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Its an important and officially recognized settlement and you already see the source for it. We don't delete articles because someone vandalized it. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per Joy. 10,000 people is fine for having a stand-alone article, so there are no administrative tools needed here. At the same time, if content contributors want to reorganize the material, that is outside the purview of AfD. Unscintillating (talk) 23:25, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.