The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duhome[edit]

Duhome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Most of the references are narrow product reviews mostly in listicles. Per WP:PRODUCTREV, Reviews that narrowly focus on a particular product or function without broader context (e.g. review of a particular meal without description of the restaurant as a whole) do not count as significant sources. Other references include non-independent coverage, a file, database, and a routine announcement dependent upon press-release like promotional wording and quotes. My WP:BEFORE found trivial mentions, databases, or product listicles, e.g., 1, 2, but I could not find CORPDEPTH-meeting sources. VickKiang (talk) 09:33, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:43, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.