The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 15:43, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Diya

[edit]

Delete per WP:NOT and WP:NOTE: Though someone has obviously but a good deal of effort into this article, Wikipedia is not a random collection of college clubs. Also, this organization has not demonstrated how it has externally-verifiable notability per WP:NOTE. Djma12 ^(talk) 15:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete The article has no links to reliable 3rd party sources, it fails WP:NOT and has no notability. Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-25-2008 • 17:27:26 17:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the sources are secondary sources, which means they cannot establish notability. I'm sure WP:V is satisfied; if sources were brought to bear which were independent of the establishment, and a thorough purging (by fire, of course) of the article were to be had (ie, to not use all those citations to Duke), then this would be a keep, but as it is, the article does not meet the requirements for inclusion. --Izno (talk) 17:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Does wiki have a policy concerning college clubs? Looking at the wikilinks at the bottom of the this article, there are dozens of similar student groups, none/few of which meet WP:NOTE criteria. Djma12 ^(talk) 19:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Other stuff exists. If you think they do not meet notability requirements, do what you will with them. --Izno (talk) 20:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.