The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (No prejudice against speedy renomination per relatively low participation herein.) North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:20, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Durationator[edit]

Durationator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think there's a slender claim of notability here % so am not speeding, but a brief seacrch throws up little of merit to establish that it passes WP:GNG. Imo this may become notable but ain't at the mo.TheLongTone (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 14:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The page is being created to begin documenting the research being done at the Durationator, which is housed at the Copryight Research Lab at Tulane Law School. We are well-known in the community of copyright. We also have a social mission of spreading copyright information. The idea is to post information here so that it is more accessible, and create sub pages. We love Wikipedia, and this is our effort to give back as we complete this decade long project. This a way to make our research on the Durationator more public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Etownsendgard (talk • contribs) 14:50, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:13, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Gnews shows a passing mention in Wired and then there's this more lengthy discussion in this book, which appears to be independent coverage. It might just squeak by WP:GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:53, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.