The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Closer's note: There is a consensus to preserve at least part of the articles' content. Thus, I am tagging both articles with ((cleanup-afd)) and am leaving a note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland to make the project's members aware of the them. Any trimming and/or merge is left to editors' discretion. -- Black Falcon(Talk)04:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Agree (with regret) with Chris - This is a potentially valuable article on a district in the southwest of Ireland. They are potentially good articles, but are not (in my view) suitable in this form for WP. However I hope that the material will be saved elsewhere. It could then be uploaded (as a number of separate pages) to a dedicated website. This should then be summarised into a WP article. The present content (bot the articles mentioned and also Durrus and District History 1700-1900 would make a very satisfactory series of webpages on a website devoted to Durrus, but it is all much too long for an encyclopaedia. Peterkingiron18:06, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge but without unnecessary trimming. On a brief look appears interesting, and Wikipedia is not paper, i.e. there is space for detail. Palmiro | Talk19:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but do a major amount of trimming. An encyclopedic history article should be written in respect to the most salient points of the city/state/district in question. For example, in History of Minneapolis, Minnesota, I included a pretty significant chunk of material about Fort Snelling and St. Anthony Falls, since they had so much impact on the city, but I didn't mention a thing about the city's phone system. Maybe the people at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland could help edit or rewrite this article. --Elkman(Elkspeak)02:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.