The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dusk and Dawn[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not really an ambiguous phrase, as none of the examples provided on the page include "Dusk and Dawn", or even come passingly close enough to justify disambiguation. bd2412 T 21:07, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not a phrase that needs disambiguation. DAB pages already exist for "dusk" and "dawn". --MelanieN (talk) 03:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No matches at all. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing here requires disambiguation, because all the phrases are different from each other. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:16, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.