The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I strongly disagree that article length is not a reason to delete, however that is no longer relevant in this case because the article has been expanded. Vicarious05:13, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, this would have been speedy material were it not a city. There should be a system where deletion worthy articles on topics that probably deserve an article are given priority cleanup. -- Kjkolb13:57, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: no matter how short or awful an article about a city, university or high school is, it is extremely unlikely to be deleted. If it were about a different subject, it would have probably been speedily deleted. -- Kjkolb05:24, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree. The stuff I added was mostly just to start out and it's kind of a grab bag of stuff. I don't know enough to say much about the other additions.--T. Anthony10:53, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As the deletion rationale no longer applies and all votes are keep, I'm going to call keep here. Punkmorten 21:15, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.