The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 17:44, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic combustion chamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently a design or prototype that was never produced. Sources provided are all dead. Other refs found suggest this was a concept some years ago, but not that dynamic combustion chambers are in use. I don’t think this is notable. Mccapra (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails any notability. Totally unsourced (dead links) and a search resulted in one link for a Dynamic combustion chamber and the

Nautilus Four Stroke, Six Cycle, Dynamic Multiphasic Combustion Engine that is not even close. Otr500 (talk) 10:47, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: per nom. Note to closing admin, the page is duplicated at the userpage of the creator, Andrewshephard. SITH (talk) 04:22, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.