The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (NAC). I may attempt to include some of the sources mentioned below. American Eagle (talk) 02:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, As Thaddeus showed it has independent non-trivial coverage from multiple sources. The article needs to be cleaned up and sourced but that is not a reason to delete. A new name 2008 (talk) 00:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thaddeus' input confirms notability. Articles that read like advertisements can always be edited or rewritten. Pastor Theo (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - sources uncovered above establish notability. Advertising tone can be dealt with through editting. -- Whpq (talk) 18:56, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.