The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 20:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ESPN Presents Stadium Anthems[edit]

Doesn't seem to be a notable album. No third-party reviews, no album art, no label even. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not finding any sources that would satisfy WP:N. Sure, almost all the individual tracks are notable, but not this compilation. Deor (talk) 01:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here's one mini-review... not really seeing anything else though. --Rividian (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable compilation album. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete fails Wikipedia:NMG#Albums Gary King (talk) 19:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It did chart (ok, barely) and was reviewed on allmusic and is notable as part of the ESPN music compilation series. --Wolfer68 (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Surprising myself here a bit. WP:MUSIC isn't clear about what to do with an album that is a compilation (unless I missed it). The general WP:N guideline says that a musician that has a song that "charts" or an album that "charts" is therefore notable, what to do when the album charts and there is no musician? Is the album notable? I believe that a compilation album, when compiled of notable artists, with notable songs, that are played in stadiums, that has charted in the most widely known "chart" Billboard, is in fact notable enough for inclusion. Needs a billboard ref for verifiability of the charting, other than that, I think the article is good to go. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 16:21, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. Please surprise me, but I'm finding nothing to keep it but the charting. Yeah, I know what WP:MUSIC says, but there's a difference between *charting* and hitting #149 on Billboard. It's not something people will remember an album for. I don't think this needs keeping. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 12:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.