The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep. (non-admin closure) - Mr X 12:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

E (surname)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Speculative, unsourced article about a non-notable surname. Fails WP:GNG.~~ - Mr X 14:12, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - Additional sources have been located to verify this subject's notability. - Mr X 12:16, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm not too familiar with Chinese, but I added several blue-linked people with the surname E. It should remain as a basic set index at the very least. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely not familiar, since they were given names. Even so, it should be a set index and moved to E (name) assuming it's kept. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it's one of the 100 surnames. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:09, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.