The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure) — Caknuck 22:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Echelon (warez) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Non-notable, most of content is nonsense about something other than what the page is supposedly about. Jeff 16:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These may not be satisfactory, but there are sources which discuss this (although they do not focus on Echelon, hence my comment that these may not be satisfactory): USA Today, the DoJ, and MSNBC via the AP Wire. Antelan talk 21:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd also recommend reading the first nomination for Deviance. the 2nd one had barely any input, most likely from people who don't know anything about them. They were throwing around guidelines for deletion anyways. Read the first nomination, where there is alot more discussion, and mostly keep votes. To say that these guys are not notable is silly. Search Deviance + warez in google. many many hits. --sumnjim talk with me·changes 16:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Locobot (talk) 02:28, 20 May 2009 (UTC) Ƙɽɨɱρȶ 01:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.