The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus. WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE is also relevant. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eckhard Wandel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with dubious notability, does not meet WP:PROF, subject has expressed a desire for deletion Keilana (talk) 16:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Where has the subject expressed a desire for deletion? Xxanthippe (talk) 22:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@Xxanthippe: They sent it to the WMF, who passed it on to me as an OTRS person/functionary to look at. Keilana (talk) 01:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks. Notability is adequate and could be a keep, but I vote Delete to accede to subject's wishes. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:32, 19 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete as above. No view on notability, but I cannot see a compelling reason to go against the subject's wishes in this case. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• del per nom. Pete.Hurd (talk) 04:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. At best a borderline case for WP:PROF, so it's ok to follow the subject's wishes. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete no clear indication of passing any notability criteria for an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:34, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as nothing at all for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 00:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.