The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, but please cite some sources in the actual article. W.marsh 16:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

EcoTalk[edit]

EcoTalk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Delete This page is nothing more than an advertisment for a show. It needs to go. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theichibun (talk • contribs) 13:37, 21 November 2006

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Notable radio program, broacast on stations across the country, 164000 Google hits. Edison 21:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Then why such a short article for it? Theichibun 12:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Short is not a criterion for deletion. See WP:STUB. --Dhartung | Talk 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, trialsanderrors 05:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep worth improving, and Im getting to feel tht is the criterion not technicalities. The ones impossible to improve, or not worth improving, are he ones to delete. DGG 06:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I get 26,800 Google hits for "Rosenberg EcoTalk" [1]. Apparently it's a daily radio program on affiliates across America - an undeniably notable program with an unfortunately short article. --Hyperbole 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, obvious WP:RS coverage. Tagging for expansion, sourcing. --Dhartung | Talk 07:41, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable show, certainly more notable than 99% of schools on this encyclopedia. Carlossuarez46 22:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Puff piece. Show notability, please. WMMartin 18:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. So it's maybe notable, but we still don't have any WP:RS to show it. We can't properly evaluate notability without them. Sandstein 06:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.