The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Alexf^(talk) 10:27, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edith Vote (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search reveals that she exists and uses social media, which does not establish biographical notability or general notability. Notability is not inherited, but the article is largely about her family, some of whom are notable. This article contains peacock language. Taking it out wouldn't leave much. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:05, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete nothing close to actual notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete CSD worthy. A7 and G11 at least Legacypac (talk) 05:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.